Voyeur Scandal in Belgium

Quadrophenia1 · Post by **Quadrophenia1** » 10 Sep 2020 21:05

I am a huge fan of SSL, but I just can't understand why members are constantly asking contributors for the exact, detailed physical descriptions of the persons or even more so, asking contributors to supply photos of them too. It makes absolutely no sense to me.

sndprv · Post by **sndprv** » 22 Nov 2020 08:51

edtraveller · Post by **edtraveller** » 23 Nov 2020 23:07

Quadrophenia1 wrote: ↑10 Sep 2020 21:05 I am a huge fan of SSL, but I just can't understand why members are constantly asking contributors for the exact, detailed physical descriptions of the persons or even more so, asking contributors to supply photos of them too. It makes absolutely no sense to me.

Pure and simple - titillation. I don't mind providing descriptions where possible. Been asked before to photo couples Im following and I won't do it. I want to be as nonobtrusive and invisible as possible. Last thing I want is to get someone's guard up making it more likely to have a corridor mic discovered, or increased risk of being caught hanging out to capture real time sounds.

All of that said, I captured this adorable one two years ago in DTLA. They went out, so never even knew if they were staying in a room or just came for the nightclub..

IMG_20201123_140605.jpg

sndprv · Post by **sndprv** » 08 Dec 2020 17:17

Married senior government lawyer, 55, who took 'upskirt' pictures of woman on the Tube AVOIDS being struck
off after blaming stress of working 80-hour weeks planning for Brexit

sndprv wrote: ↑27 Sep 2019 02:02 Man sentenced in one of first English upskirting convictions

Upskirting lawyer Daren Timson-Hunt runs away from court

sndprv · Post by **sndprv** » 10 Jun 2021 21:41

All right, all right. Who on here was perving on their neighbours and got themselves caught?

Stalker caught removing listening devices he planted in neighbour’s house

edtraveller · Post by **edtraveller** » 11 Jun 2021 00:32

A) A security 'expert' wouldn't suspect hidden security cams in this day and age??
B) Trying to record a 64 year old woman? Whatever floats the boat I guess.

In the days before I started recording, I had loaned my apartment out to a couple on their way to a long awaited honeymoon, and to my liking when I returned found evidences of their sexual encounter. Wish to hell now I had one of my USB's plugged in!

sndprv · Post by **sndprv** » 13 Oct 2021 20:00

Could EVERY doorbell camera owner face £100,000 fine after landmark ruling? How inadvertently filming neighbours and storing footage breaches their privacy under new data protection laws

[...]

However, Judge Melissa Clarke dismissed Mr Woodard's claim that the driveway camera was used legitimately to deter criminals from stealing his car and ruled that 'crime prevention, could surely be achieved by something less' than the devices.

She concluded that the devices captured images and audio on Dr Fairhurst's property including her gate, garden and car parking spaces, that this was all Dr Fairhurst's personal data, that Mr Woodard had breached UK GDPR by failing to process her data 'transparently', and that he then 'sought to actively mislead the Claimant about how and whether the Cameras operated
and what they captured'.

The judge also took particular issue with the camera's audio range, concluding: 'I am satisfied that the
extent of range to which these devices can capture audio is well beyond the range of video that they capture,
and in my view cannot be said to be reasonable for crime prevention'.

[...]